As a fan of Indiana University basketball, I am increasingly frustrated with the team’s erratic performance. In one game, they show flashes of brilliance — executing plays with precision, demonstrating grit, and displaying teamwork that reminds us of the Hoosiers’ storied history. Then, almost inexplicably, they falter in the next game, or even the next half, playing with a lack of focus, drive, and intention. How can a team swing so wildly between inspired and lackluster performances?
Let me be clear: I am not a sports journalist, analyst, former athlete, or coach. I don’t claim to possess insider knowledge or expertise in basketball strategy. However, I’ve managed people, led teams, and run my business. From that perspective, I see something in the dynamics of this team that raises questions no one seems to be asking outright. Could it be that the players do not want to play for Coach Woodson?
Coach Woodson has publicly acknowledged the team’s lack of consistency and focus. He has said he is working to determine the root of the issue. But perhaps the answer lies closer to home. Of course, no coach would admit that players don’t support him. Still, how else can we explain a team that can dominate one half only to unravel in the next? Their inconsistency sends a message: “We don’t like or care to support our coach.”
This might be controversial, but I haven’t seen it discussed openly. Perhaps no one else dares to say it. Maybe it’s easier to blame the players’ youth, the challenges of transitioning to college basketball attempts to craft a team from the transfer portal, or even the strength of the competition. But from my perspective, these excuses fail to address the more significant issue — a disconnect between the players and the person leading them.
Leadership is more than strategy or play-calling; it fosters trust, buy-in, and a shared vision. As a former business leader, I’ve learned that when a team fails to deliver consistently, it’s often because they don’t feel inspired by or aligned with their leader. Employees may not consistently articulate dissatisfaction directly, but it shows in their performance. Could the same principle apply to basketball?
Of course, this is only speculation. I’m not in the locker room and don’t know the dynamics between Coach Woodson and his players. However, as someone who has observed leadership in many forms, I wonder if this team’s inconsistency is less about talent or execution and more about relationships. If players feel disengaged, undervalued, or uninspired, that discontent will inevitably manifest on the court.
As a fan, I want to see Indiana University basketball thrive. I want to cheer for a team with the talent, unity, and passion to play at its best every game. Coach Woodson has a long road ahead in solving the mystery of this team’s inconsistency. I hope he looks beyond the Xs and Os and examines the intangible factors that might hold his team back.
Whether or not my theory holds water, one thing is clear: Indiana fans deserve a team that brings heart, focus, and consistency to every game. The Hoosiers’ potential is undeniable. The question is whether they can find the right formula to unlock it.
